Superintelligence needs supervision.

Ask a question in plain English. Consilens brings multiple AI perspectives together to challenge assumptions, expose uncertainty, and produce the clearest answer it can defend.

Ask Consilens Watch the Council Work

Switch between two real Consilens runs recorded live with GPT-5.4 Mini, Claude Sonnet 4, and Grok 4.3. No scripted model quotes.

Watch the Council Work

Was the moon landing real?

Where the models landed

3 perspectives

Main readGPT-5.4 Mini

I land strongly on real, with the important distinction that some Apollo imagery and communications artifacts can be messy without threatening the core event.

OpenAI

PushbackClaude Sonnet 4

The moon landings definitely happened, but I want to acknowledge the conspiracy claims aren't all equally weak.

Anthropic

AddedGrok 4.3

The landings hold up under direct evidence while most hoax arguments fall apart on basic physics.

xAI

Consilens

The best answer is yes: Apollo 11, and the later Apollo landings, really put humans on the Moon. The strongest evidence is not one photo or one government statement. It is the pileup of independent lines.

Confidence: HighVery high confidence that the Moon landings happened; low but nonzero uncertainty remains around specific archival details, edits, or technical documentation.

What would change this

A reproducible finding that Apollo lunar samples are not lunar.
Verified internal records showing staged footage matched to mission data.
Independent proof that telemetry or tracking was fabricated.
Modern site imaging contradicting the lander and equipment locations.

Superintelligence needs supervision.

The smartest models still get confident and wrong. Consilens makes them check each other, so you see where they disagree instead of trusting one voice.

How it works

Read the answer. Or read the argument.

Type your question normally. Consilens decides how hard to think, then gives you one answer up front and the model-by-model reasoning behind it.

Ask like you would anyone.

No prompt tricks. Ask the question in plain language.

Consilens chooses the depth.

Quick answer, a second look, or a fuller council - chosen for the question, not blindly.

You see what survived challenge.

One clear answer on top. Tap why to see where the models agreed, disagreed, and stayed uncertain.

Why it is different

It does not hide the hard part.

Consilens is for questions where a single confident answer is not enough. The app keeps the answer readable while preserving the doubt underneath.

It pushes back

Most AI agrees with you a little too easily. Consilens is built to challenge weak assumptions, including its own.

It shows its doubt

Every answer can be opened up to see the catch, the uncertainty, and what would change the conclusion.

It brings in backup

Simple question? One clear answer. Hard, contested, or high-stakes question? Consilens quietly checks more models and tells you why.

Built for questions that matter

When the answer matters, one opinion is not enough.

Am I right about this, or am I missing something?

What's the strongest case against what I believe?

Is this health trend actually worth it?

What's really going on with this news story?

Help me decide, and tell me what I'm not seeing.

Ask modes

Choose the kind of answer you need, or let Consilens decide.

Best answer

A clear reply first, with caveats only where they matter.

Challenge my thinking

Find weak spots, hidden assumptions, and the strongest counterargument.

Debate the sides

Competing views argued fairly, then resolved into a conclusion.

Compare options

Weigh tradeoffs, name the deciding criteria, and recommend a direction.

Honest by design

Confidence you can actually trust.

Consilens is designed to admit uncertainty, keep model use bounded, and make the cost of deeper thinking predictable.

It says "not sure"

When the evidence is thin or mixed, Consilens says so instead of guessing with a confident tone.

No runaway answers

Each question gets a focused, bounded response. You can stop an answer anytime.

Predictable daily limits

Daily caps keep model use predictable, and Consilens only brings in extra models when the question needs it.

More than one worldview

Consilens compares models from different makers on purpose, so one company's blind spots do not go unchallenged.

Your conversations

Private questions deserve a careful system.

Your conversations are yours. Consilens keeps what you need to use the app and avoids turning private chat into public training material.

FAQ

Questions people ask first.

How is this different from ChatGPT?

ChatGPT is one model answering. Consilens can put several top models on the same question and show where they disagree, so a confident answer cannot quietly skip the hard part.

Does it use several models every time?

No. Consilens keeps simple questions light and only brings in more models when the question needs a second look or a fuller debate.

Will it just tell me I'm right?

No. The product is designed to challenge your framing when that is useful. You can also ask it to challenge you on purpose.

What about current events?

Consilens uses fresh context when available and shows what the answer depends on. It does not pretend to have universal live web access.

Which models does it use?

Consilens can draw on models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI, depending on the question and available routing.

Early access

Stop trusting one opinion.

Get on the early access list for iPhone.

Get early access