Risky PRs
Review pull requests before the wrong implementation becomes merge debt.
Landing concepts
For engineering teams using GitHub
Multi-model review for risky software decisions.
Consilens runs structured review across pull requests, architecture choices, and blocked branches, then writes the verdict back to GitHub.
DecisionDissentNext stepBack to GitHub
Built around the stack teams already use
GitHubVercelSupabaseCloud Run
Use it when the decision matters
Start where one answer is not enough.
Consilens is for the moments where ambiguity is expensive and the team needs a recorded decision.
Architecture calls
Compare competing paths against the same packet and expose the tradeoffs.
Blocked branches
Find the actual blocker, the safest path out, and the next best owner.
What you get
A tighter process with a durable output.
Clear recommendation
Get a verdict instead of another long thread.
Preserved dissent
Keep disagreement and unknowns visible instead of flattening them away.
GitHub-native output
Write the decision back into the workflow where the team is already operating.
Trust
Built to minimize custody.
GitHub stays the system of record. Dashboard history stays metadata-only by default.
Customer-owned artifacts by default
Metadata-only dashboard history
GitHub-native workflow output
FAQ
Questions teams ask first.
Who is this for?
Engineering teams using GitHub who need more than one model answer before making a risky decision.
Why not just ask one model?
Because a single answer hides disagreement. Consilens is built to force independent positions before synthesis.
Do you store our code?
The default posture is customer-owned artifacts and metadata-only dashboard history.
Next step
Connect GitHub and run the first council.
The deeper status, checkpoints, and evidence live on the runtime board, not on the homepage.